New Tech from NASA Transforms Archival Moon Landing Footage

New Tech from NASA Transforms Archival Moon Landing Footage

We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

Astronaut Buzz Aldrin on the moonNASA

We are all familiar with the spectacular-yet-staccato video of the Apollo 11 moon landing. To our modern eyes, accustomed to ever-increasing video streaming clarity, watching the video from 1969 seems almost surreal in its lack of resolution and smooth ticking over of each frame-per-second.

Making the old feel new

Advances in technology allowed NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) team to take the archival footage of the moon landing and improve its quality. Taming the jerky video into a more palatable viewing experience required a team of technical experts.


How they did it

NASA explains the process used to create the video, saying “The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) team reconstructed the last three minutes of the landing trajectory (latitude, longitude, orientation, velocity, altitude) using landmark navigation and altitude call outs from the voice recording. From this trajectory information, and high resolution LROC Narrow Angle Camera (LROC NAC) images and topography, we simulated what Armstrong saw in those final minutes as he guided the LM down to the surface of the Moon."

Take a high-def look

Watch a side-by-side comparison of the archival footage and the reconstruction footage.

Watch the video: Why NASA quarantined the Apollo 11 astronauts (July 2022).


  1. Pat

    It's a funny thing

  2. Kyrksen

    I decline.

  3. Kagrel

    Of course. I subscribe to all of the above. Let's discuss this issue.

  4. Voodoogore

    Do you like to write such that then a discussion of a thousand pages, you notice well the topics in demand

  5. Terry

    Of course. All of the above is true. Let's discuss this issue. Here or at PM.

Write a message